Okay, I fully support
Jim Roos's fight to protect both property rights and freedom of speech. That said, I have a problem with this sign:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10eb4/10eb4b3140878ec2220603d2795689a63ca79a65" alt=""
Mr. Roos appears to have fallen prey to a graphical form of
over-negation. A red circle with diagonal slash means "stop or oppose the thing inside the circle." Does Roos really want us to
stop ending eminent domain abuse?
(Via
Cato-at-Liberty.)
2 comments:
Roos doesn't consider this negation, just etxra emphasis:
"That, Roos counters, is part of the message. 'We're saying emphatically, No,' he said."
Yeah. Lame excuse, IMHO.
Post a Comment