I’m not much of a sports fan. I didn’t watch a single game of the World Baseball Classic. It doesn’t bother me in the slightest that the U.S. team lost miserably. I actually think it’s kind of funny, given that no non-U.S. teams (other than Toronto) are even eligible to win the so-called World Series. My national pride, such as it is, is not wrapped up in the outcome of a sports event.
What on earth would make people think the best American baseball team will consist of a kludged-together cast of stars? A team is more than the sum of its members; it is also the complementarity of the parts, the routines they have honed together, the instincts they have about each other, the trust that has developed among them, and so on. I’ll bet any World Series contender from the last five years would have done a better job than the hodgepodge team actually fielded. Is there anyone who’s more excited about the annual All-Star Game than the World Series? The same criticism applies to the Olympics, the World Cup, and every other international competition that operates by cobbling together event-specific teams instead of selecting among existing teams.
This is not an excuse for the U.S. team’s performance, of course, because (I presume) all the other countries’ teams were formed the same way. It’s a criticism of how the whole competition was conceived and executed.