tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post110994683365232202..comments2024-01-28T00:20:40.933-08:00Comments on Agoraphilia: On Treasonous BloggingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1110153570771265142005-03-06T15:59:00.000-08:002005-03-06T15:59:00.000-08:00100 hours! I just fainted!!100 hours! I just fainted!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1110118435801701442005-03-06T06:13:00.000-08:002005-03-06T06:13:00.000-08:00SK: How *could* you be my number one fan? Imposs...SK: How *could* you be my number one fan? Impossible! I've got a *Mom* for that. Still, if you even read *part* of the paper, I can thank you for joining a *very* exclusive club. Moreso, even, as you didn't call it, "Rubbish."<br /><br />It's not so tough to write a law review article once you get the routine down. I'd say that one took, oh, 100 hours or so.Tom W. Bellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02790351458154066358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1110104067711909632005-03-06T02:14:00.000-08:002005-03-06T02:14:00.000-08:00Good luck Tom. I actually read through about half ...Good luck Tom. I actually read through about half of your paper. Alas, I'm not a number one fan. He/she would have read the whole thing. I tried doing that with Glen's "Rational Choice Hermaneutics" and " A Search Theory of Suicide" and boy, was i proud that I got through at least half or 1/3, especially "Rational Choice Hermaneutics." I found it difficult to fully comprehend since I was not really familiar with the concept, although I knew what "hermaneutics" was. <br /><br />Your paper wasn't too long since your footnote section was practically half of every page. How long does a paper like this take to write? I assume that it can potentially take forever depending on research, research data, and whatever else. <br /><br />skAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1110050435100148292005-03-05T11:20:00.000-08:002005-03-05T11:20:00.000-08:00Wrathius: You see now why I said "madcap"! Sure ...Wrathius: You see now why I said "madcap"! Sure enough, legal academics (or, indeed, anyone writing for student-edites law reviews) can make concurrent submissions. And, yes, we law profs know that our colleagues in other fields do things differently (often to their chagrin, as you hint). But there is a salient difference: We are writing for student-edited journals, rather than peer-edited ones. I won't spell out all the ramifications of that distinctions, here, as I think you can probably work them out, yourself.Tom W. Bellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02790351458154066358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1110050187445413032005-03-05T11:16:00.000-08:002005-03-05T11:16:00.000-08:00This seems odd to me--in legal academia, is it com...This seems odd to me--in legal academia, is it common practice to submit a paper to more than one journal at once?<br /><br />In my field (philosophy), this is a big no-no. This has the effect, as you might guess, of making it that much more difficult to get published (submit to Journal A, six months later, get a rejection, submit to B, wait six months...)Andrew M. Baileyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12606675886229313577noreply@blogger.com