tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post116781559155743524..comments2024-01-28T00:20:40.933-08:00Comments on Agoraphilia: The Stock and Flow of Blog TopicsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1167851312457678882007-01-03T11:08:00.000-08:002007-01-03T11:08:00.000-08:00we'll take whatever scraps you throw our way. do y...we'll take whatever scraps you throw our way. <BR/><BR/>do you know what the average life of a one or two-person blog is? many of the blogs i've enjoyed over the years have come to a close--often seemingly out of the blue--because the author loses track of the muse (or dumps her).dgmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02049888210783313681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1167842494407584202007-01-03T08:41:00.000-08:002007-01-03T08:41:00.000-08:00Glen, you should definitely blog more about why yo...Glen, you should definitely blog more about why you don't blog more often.<BR/><BR/>Great reading!<BR/><BR/>Seriously, blog as much or as little as you like. The old imperative of "so many posts a day/week/hour" no longer applies because anyone who really cares about what you have to say has subscribed to your blog's news feed.Kevin B. O'Reillyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16145886080665210498noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1167833789060769282007-01-03T06:16:00.000-08:002007-01-03T06:16:00.000-08:00I would rather you keep the blog alive with occasi...I would rather you keep the blog alive with occasional posts. I have enjoyed reading your commentary, and with news readers (e.g. bloglines) there is no extra effort for us to keep in touch with your site. I would rather read very good, original posts infrequently, then be bombarded with constant "gay marriage" this and "DI vs. evolution" that, and "Bush lied and should be impeached" ad nauseum, which I see on many other sites.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com