tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post116051244428204645..comments2024-01-28T00:20:40.933-08:00Comments on Agoraphilia: Why a One-Way Constitution?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1161143957259301542006-10-17T20:59:00.000-07:002006-10-17T20:59:00.000-07:00Professor Bell, Your comments are reasonable. Luck...Professor Bell, <BR/><BR/>Your comments are reasonable. Lucky <A HREF="http://positiveliberty.com/2006/10/a-constitution-is-not-a-contract.html" REL="nofollow">Sandefur's reply</A> was so measured--I was waiting for him to call you a neoconfederate or apologize for slavery. <BR/><BR/>I too had a few civil email discussions with Sandefur in the past, and some substantive disagreements (e.g. <A HREF="http://www.lewrockwell.com/kinsella/kinsella12.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>, <A HREF="http://www.lewrockwell.com/kinsella/kinsella10.html" REL="nofollow">here</A> and <A HREF="http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/002135.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>) but eventually he adopted the Catoite line of attacking those who disagree with his Jaffaite Lincoln idolatry as "neo-confederates" and the like (see <A HREF="http://positiveliberty.com/2006/09/incest.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>; some replies <A HREF="" REL="nofollow">here</A> and <A HREF="http://blog.lewrockwell.com/lewrw/archives/011305.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>). I guess Sandefur is too timid to call you a neoconfederate slavery-lover for your views, though he must be biting his tongue.Stephan Kinsellahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07986650653184633661noreply@blogger.com