tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post113063389943920725..comments2024-01-28T00:20:40.933-08:00Comments on Agoraphilia: Alphabetization Challenge ResultsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3829599.post-1130769537099925662005-10-31T06:38:00.000-08:002005-10-31T06:38:00.000-08:00I would personally guess inconsistancies in the me...I would personally guess inconsistancies in the method in which they were organized. Just imagine how many people had to have been working on the A section of it---the amount of businesses that appear, disappear and reappear over the years. One person being inconsistant throws things off.<BR/><BR/>I worked for a company that assembled the books for one of those restuarant review places. They'd put out a full colored book describing all the finest places to eat, every single year. But it was hard for a place to lose the status once they received it, so many entries remained the same every year, and pages had to be inserted inbetween, done in alphabetical order.<BR/><BR/>While revising a section, I noticed that about 2/3rds of the Restuarants that started with "the", ie. "The Blue Ginger", would be listed under the first letter of the second word. So that, logically, would go under B. 1/3 of them were listed under T, where "The" would go, and then arranged under that in regular alphabetical order.<BR/><BR/>I noticed the inconsistancies laid in the ones placed under "the", then also noticed that was how the newest woman on the project organized her filing cabinets. The inconsistancies were kept the same because the company did not want the restuarants to be confused by their new placement in the book, and perhaps, miff those who would be pushed further back into the book by all the "The's" being spread out.<BR/><BR/>That was a long way of saying, I think the same thing may have happened here. Someone may have made an error, but it is too much hassle to disrupt the order of things.Jeanne Mariehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12141680322340048218noreply@blogger.com